Training

Research

We-ism is a doctrine that willingly exposes itself to criticism. Our reference work devotes entire sections to its own limits, its blind spots, and the most serious objections that can be raised against it — because a doctrine that survives only by avoiding contradiction is not a solid doctrine.

Tuzafrika supports and welcomes:

  • Research work in political philosophy, geopolitics, and relational anthropology
  • Academic collaborations around the case study of the Lake Kivu basin and the Great Lakes region
  • An openly assumed critical dialogue with the communitarian, pan-African, and Western traditions that We-ism draws upon or distinguishes itself from

Research programme

The central question

Tuzafrika's research programme is organised around one guiding question: how can ethical, social and geopolitical relations be rebuilt on a global scale, given that exclusive individualism (the "I") leads to the asphyxiation of the human bond, and that uniform collectivism (the "All") destroys personal freedom?

Three corollary questions structure the whole of the institute's work:

  • On what ontological and metaphorical principle can the value of human existence be redefined, outside the sole logic of possession or scarcity?
  • How can this ethics of relation be transposed from the micro-individual scale to the macro-geopolitical scale, particularly in zones of fracture and intense physical interdependence such as the African Great Lakes region?
  • What rigorous method of action is available to civil society and institutions to substitute horizontal alliance for the sterile verticality of charity?

Three working hypotheses

  • Human existence finds its ontological consistency only through usefulness rendered to others — canonical formula: "I am useful, therefore We are. We are, therefore I exist."
  • At the macroscopic scale, neighbouring states and peoples are not watertight entities engaged in a zero-sum game, but strands of one and the same geopolitical rope (the Knot of Destinies).
  • The praxis of Awakened Service, structured around four concrete disciplines, provides a transposable and effective method of action for building a credible alternative to vertical charity and extractive capitalism.

Methodology and scope

The approach is one of interdisciplinary critical analysis, combining political philosophy, historical sociology, the anthropology of relation and strategic geopolitics, across three complementary registers: textual and doctrinal analysis of the founding texts, an empirical and geophysical case study (notably the Lake Kivu and Ruzizi basin), and a phenomenology of praxis — the clinical observation of the institute's field practices.

The study is empirically anchored in the African Great Lakes region while claiming a universal vocation, and focuses exclusively on the doctrinal trilogy of We-ism — Useful-Existence, the Knot of Destinies, Awakened Service — leaving aside matters of the association's internal management.

Bibliography

Bibliography and theoretical lineage

The corpus drawn upon by the doctrine is organised into ten families of references.

Philosophy of relation and personalism

African sources and pan-Africanism

Critique of radical individualism

Classical utilitarianism (distinguished from Useful-Existence)

Marxism and collectivism (partial convergence, fundamental divergence)

Geopolitics and international relations

Solidarism and reciprocity

Conflict resolution and communication

Social economy and the governance of the commons

Critique of development and pedagogy

Empirical and institutional sources — the Lake Kivu case study

Doctrinal texts of the institute

Contributing to the research

Researchers, doctoral candidates and academic institutions working on the philosophy of relation, the geopolitics of border areas, or the social and solidarity economy are invited to contact the institute for any collaboration, critical review, or proposal for a complementary field of study.

Are you a researcher or a student? We are open to collaborations, critical reviews, and comparative work.